Conservatives' National Service Proposal Faces Criticism
Lord Dannatt has weight in with his concerns over the Tory proposal
Hello readers,
Welcome back to the Woz Report. In this edition, we’re talking politics, and specifically about the UK general election. The Conservative Party's proposal to reintroduce national service has faced significant criticism from former military leaders, who argue it could undermine defence spending and operational efficiency.
Lord West, a former Chief of the Naval staff has criticised the proposal. “We need to spend more on defence, and – by doing what he’s suggesting – money will be sucked out of defence.” Also weighing in on a national service counter argument is Lord Dannatt, a former Chief of the General Staff. “The costs of this would be considerable in terms of trainers and infrastructure. This task cannot just be imposed on the armed forces as an extra thing to do.”
Why is National Service on the Conservative electoral agenda?
Britain enforced mandatory 24-month national service in one of the armed forces for all physically fit males between the ages of 17 and 21, in a post-war scheme which ran from 1949 to 1960. Since then, Britain has relied on volunteers to bolster the three branches of military.
In recent years, the United Kingdom has faced a pressing challenge: a significant decline in military recruitment numbers, a situation that has manifested under Tory leadership. This decline comes at a time when global political uncertainties demand a strong and responsive defence capability. The situation calls for innovative solutions, one of which is the reintroduction of national service. While controversial, national service could provide the necessary resources bolster the UK's defence in an increasingly volatile world.
The Recruitment Crisis
In 2012, the MoD outsourced recruitment to Capita, a leading provider of business process services. However, the recruitment process has received lots of criticism.
There have been major difficulties with the company’s online application process leading to long delays between initial application and entry to training. Delays which have, in many cases, led to potential recruits giving up and looking for employment elsewhere.
Consequently, the army is currently approximately 5,000 short of its 82,500 target for trained soldiers (figures relate to 2019). UK Defence Journal
This shortfall jeopardises the military's ability to maintain readiness and effectiveness. The reasons for this decline are multifaceted, including demographic changes, competition from other career opportunities, and evolving societal attitudes towards military service, and military pay has stagnated compared to CPI inflation. Take cyber security an example. Cyber practitioners can earn salaries four times that of their military counterparts.
John Healey, the shadow defence secretary was quick to wade in with criticism of the Tory party’s leadership. “Since 2010, Tory ministers have missed recruitment targets every year, hollowed out and underfunded our armed forces, and cut the British army to its smallest size since Napoleon. It’s time for change. Britain will be better defended with Labour.” via the Guardian.
Global Political Uncertainties
The global political landscape is more unpredictable than ever. From the resurgence of great power rivalries to the persistent threat of terrorism and regional conflicts, the demands on the UK's military are growing. Historical operations such as those in Northern Ireland, the Balkans, and the Middle East required extensive resources and personnel. In today's context, with stretched budgets and fewer recruits, replicating such extensive military commitments would be challenging.
The UK's ability to respond to international crises and fulfil its defence obligations is compromised without adequate troop numbers. National service could provide a steady and reliable stream of personnel, ensuring that the UK is prepared to meet both current and future security challenges. Recruitment is one thing, funding is another.
The US general election will undoubtedly impact Britain’s defence spending strategy. If re-elected, Donald Trump is likely to put pressure on any country not spending enough of their GDP on defence. Mr Trump has already questioned why the US has 35,000 troops deployed in South Korea, a nation listed at 13 in the GDP rankings.
The Need for Systemic Change
To maximise the effectiveness of national service, the current system needs a comprehensive overhaul. One critical area for reform is the training and development of recruits. The modern military environment requires robust soldiering skills, yet there has been an increasing focus on political correctness within the training programs. While ensuring an inclusive and respectful environment is important, it should not come at the expense of operational effectiveness.
Training programs should emphasise physical fitness, discipline, and combat readiness. This shift would ensure that recruits are not only well-prepared for the demands of military service but also instill a sense of resilience and adaptability. By focusing on core soldiering skills, the military can cultivate a more capable and reliable force.
Feel free to safely leave a tip in my tip jar here. 👇
Conclusion
It appears the Conservatives are seeking ‘electoral opportunism’ with the proposal to introduce the National Service Act 2025. While national service could address recruitment issues, other strategies, such as improving military salaries, modernising recruitment methods, and investing in retention programs, might be more effective and less disruptive. As the world becomes increasingly unpredictable, a well-prepared and resilient military is essential for safeguarding the nation's interests and security.
Read more